Breaking News: Intermittent Fasting Outperforms Calorie Restriction in Weight Loss Study

Breaking News: Intermittent Fasting Outperforms Calorie Restriction in Weight Loss Study 


Intermittent fasting effective alternative for weight loss




In a groundbreaking study conducted by researchers at the University of Illinois Chicago, intermittent fasting has emerged as a more effective approach for weight loss compared to calorie restriction.


Published in the JAMA Network Open, the study focused on individuals with Type 2 diabetes and aimed to assess their ability to lose weight and manage blood sugar levels.


Intermittent fasting, often referred to as time-restrictive eating, demonstrated remarkable efficacy as a weight loss method in a cohort of 75 participants meticulously analyzed by the University of Illinois Chicago scientists.


The study revealed that those who adhered to a specific eight-hour eating window, from noon to 8 p.m. daily, experienced more substantial weight loss over a six-month period than those who were advised to cut their calorie intake by 25%.


Both groups exhibited similar reductions in long-term blood sugar levels, as indicated by hemoglobin A1C testing, which assesses blood sugar levels over the preceding three months.


Senior author Krista Varady, a professor in the Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition at the University of Illinois Cancer Center, emphasized the implications of the findings, stating, "Our study shows that time-restricted eating might be an effective alternative to traditional dieting for people who can't do the traditional diet or are burned out on it."


"For many people trying to lose weight, counting time is easier than counting calories," Varady added.


The study participants were categorized into three groups: those who followed time-restricted eating, those who reduced calorie intake, and a control group. Over a six-month duration, various health indicators such as weight, waist circumference, and blood sugar levels were monitored.


Varady pointed out that the time-restricted eating group likely found it more manageable to adhere to their routines, considering that patients with diabetes are generally advised to reduce calorie intake initially.


The researchers noted that, although participants in the time-restricted eating group were not explicitly instructed to reduce their calorie consumption, they naturally did so by adhering to a set eating window.


The study reported no significant adverse events during the six-month research period, and occurrences of both hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) did not vary between the diet groups and the control group.


With one in ten U.S. residents currently grappling with diabetes, a statistic expected to surge to one in three by 2050, these findings hold immense significance. More than half of the study participants were Black, and another 40% were Hispanic.


Varady underscored the importance of these results in prompting further extensive research in the future. Moreover, she encouraged physicians to consider time-restrictive eating as a viable option for weight loss and blood sugar management among diabetes patients.

Next Post Previous Post
No Comment
Add Comment
comment url